Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Budget topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Bronxville board debates budget that would exceed tax levy cap, plans special meeting before May vote

Bronxville Union Free School District Board of Education · March 19, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Board finance presentation laid out a $57.6 million proposed budget that would exceed the tax levy cap by $1,381,326; officials said the 4.8% levy increase would require a 60% supermajority and the finance committee will reconvene to finalize numbers before a special adoption meeting.

The Bronxville Union Free School District board heard a detailed budget presentation outlining a proposed $57.6 million budget and a tax levy of roughly $50.4–50.5 million — a 4.8% levy increase that the presenter said exceeds the computed tax levy cap by $1,381,326 and therefore would require a 60% supermajority at the May referendum.

Why it matters: Board leaders said that remaining at the cap this year would force programmatic reductions across the district, including larger elementary and middle school class sizes, fewer high‑school electives and cuts to athletics and the performing arts. With salary and benefit costs making up roughly three‑quarters of the budget, officials said inflation and rising health‑insurance costs are the primary drivers pushing the proposal over the cap.

"The bottom line is we're finally reaching a tipping point with the budget," said Dan (district staff member), the presenter, describing a multi‑year trend of operating budgets lagging inflation and warning of rising health‑insurance and transportation costs. He told trustees the district's model currently assumes health‑insurance increases of about 8% annually and that, without steps to bend that curve, debt service for upcoming capital projects will further strain future years.

The presentation included an example of homeowner impact that was corrected during the meeting. A numerical slide originally contained an incorrect example for a $3 million assessed home; the corrected figure presented to the board is $39,631 for next year (a change of $369), and the board agreed to reissue corrected communications.

Officials stressed that the proposed levy is modest in percentage terms compared with the programmatic harm of deep cuts. "In order to meet the levy limit this year, we'd be looking at programmatic cuts across the board," a board member said during discussion.

Next steps: Trustees agreed not to adopt the budget at the meeting. Instead, the finance committee will meet again to verify figures and the board will hold a special meeting to adopt the budget in time for the May 19 referendum. The presenter said strong current‑year revenue performance — driven in part by special‑education tuition billed at State Education Department approved rates — has improved the district's projected surplus and will help maintain bond rating as the district plans capital work.

The board directed staff to provide a concise, one‑page summary for public communication and to correct the numerical slide before materials are distributed.