Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Policy Updates topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Policy review committee advances MSBA wording updates; most items set for consent or first reading
Summary
At a March 24 meeting, the Burnsville‑Eagan‑Savage School District 191 Policy Review Committee reviewed MSBA‑recommended wording updates to multiple policies (211, 404, 405, 406, 410 and 701). Two items were placed on the consent agenda; others were scheduled for first reading.
Get email alerts on the Policy Updates topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Burnsville‑Eagan‑Savage School District 191 Policy Review Committee on March 24 reviewed a series of Minnesota School Boards Association (MSBA) recommended wording updates to district policies and agreed to route most items either to the consent agenda or to a first reading at the next board meeting.
Dr. Latana Daniels, the district superintendent, presented policy 211, “Criminal or civil action against school district, school board member, employee or student,” saying the changes are MSBA recommendations and are limited to a cross‑reference update. “Yes, I am presenting policy 211, criminal or civil action against school district, and the changes that have been made are changes that MSBA recommends,” Daniels said. The committee agreed that 211 is minor and should be placed on the consent agenda.
Stacy Sovine, the district’s executive director of administrative services, presented the bulk of the proposed edits. On policy 404, governing employment background checks, Sovine described MSBA’s minor wording revisions and addressed committee questions about scope. A committee member asked whether references to “a school” should instead read “the school district” so the requirement clearly covers district locations and roles outside individual school buildings. Sovine said the policy language mirrors statutory requirements about who must undergo checks but added that clarifying district‑wide application would not hurt the policy. The committee agreed the edit is minor and advanced the item for first reading.
Sovine also described a word change in policy 405, veterans preference — replacing the term “reject” with “does not select” — and said no other substantive changes were recommended. For policy 406, on public and private personnel data, Sovine noted MSBA’s language clarifications about what personnel information is publicly requestable versus what requires consent to post.
On family and medical leave (policy 410), Sovine told the committee the district is updating references to reflect Minnesota’s Paid Medical Leave Act and removing older maternity‑leave language. “MSBA is adjusting… with the recent paid medical leave act,” she said, explaining the change aligns district policy to state law. For policy 701, dealing with budget establishment and adoption, Sovine said MSBA streamlined language to reflect rapidly changing statute requirements and to simplify some clause wording; committee members described parts of the draft as “clunky” in phrasing but acknowledged the edits were statute‑driven.
Director Mickelson confirmed the committee’s routing decisions: policies 211 and 405 will be placed on the consent portion of the next board meeting; policies 404, 406, 410 and 701 will return for first reading; policies listed with no MSBA changes (401, 701.1, 702, 703, 705, 705.1, 705.2 and 807) will be placed on consent. Sarah, a staff member, summarized the routing for the record.
No formal motions or recorded roll‑call votes were taken at the committee meeting. The committee adjourned at 5:15 p.m.
The changes discussed are primarily wording and cross‑reference updates recommended by MSBA and intended to keep district policies aligned with current state statute and practice. The items will be revisited at the full board meeting for formal action.

