Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Curriculum Adoption topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Parents and board question CKLA textbook units; board hears process and possible cuts
Summary
During discussion of K–5 reading materials, a parent raised concerns about third-grade coverage of the Big Bang and mythology; administrators said the committee preferred CKLA third edition and explained that specific chapters can be skipped or clarified in curriculum maps and that the third edition differs from the second.
Parents and school leaders debated the proposed K–5 reading adoption during the Wa-Nee Community Schools board meeting as the board reviewed committee recommendations for textbook adoption.
Shawn Johnson, speaking during public comment, said parents and some teachers are worried that portions of proposed elementary materials do not reflect the community’s values or are not developmentally appropriate. "There's a growing concern among some teachers and community members that the curriculum being considered, and in some cases already introduced, does not reflect values and expectations or age-appropriate standards of this community," he said, and asked the board to "take a deeper look" at materials presented.
Administration described the curriculum-selection process: the district reviewed state-approved options, convened teacher and parent committees (15 committee members), hosted publisher presentations, and then provided full kits for building-level review. The committee largely favored CKLA third edition (13 of 15 members ranked it their top choice). The curriculum presenter acknowledged parent concerns about unit content and said some chapters could be omitted from classroom instruction or addressed through curriculum mapping. Specifically, the presenter noted that third-grade unit five includes a chapter referencing the Hubble Telescope and the Big Bang; the presenter said the chapter is short (three paragraphs) and is presented as a scientific theory rather than definitive fact, and that skipping that chapter would not prevent teaching needed vocabulary.
Board members asked about the adoption process, parent access to full materials, differences between CKLA editions, and how the district would ensure excluded content does not get taught. Administrators said kits and digital access had been provided to committee and parent representatives and described steps for teachers and instructional coaches to manage instructional emphasis. The district plans to return with a formal adoption request at a future meeting after circulating the referenced PDFs and parent feedback forms.
No formal adoption vote took place at this meeting.
