Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Student Assessments topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board hears assessment results: two grades show gains; staff outline remediation and retest plans
Summary
Staff reported 67% of second graders and 57% of third graders passed the recent assessment, highlighted approximately six third-graders at risk of retention, and outlined remediation, retest windows and summer supports.
Get email alerts on the Student Assessments topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
District staff presented preliminary assessment results and described plans to support students who did not meet proficiency targets.
The presenter reported that 67% of second graders passed the assessment and 57% of third graders passed. While percentages improved in some grades, staff said raw counts and cohort sizes affect interpretation: some year-to-year percentage differences reflected shifts in class size. Staff identified about six third-grade students who currently lack criteria for a good-cause exemption and therefore could face retention if they do not pass upcoming attempts.
Why it matters: These assessment results drive remediation and scheduling decisions for next year. Staff described opportunities for additional testing in a mid-May window and a summer attempt for students who still need to meet standards. For students with qualifying IEPs or other program-based exemptions, a good-cause exemption may apply but program-duration limits were noted as a recent change affecting eligibility.
Support and next steps: Teachers have begun targeted intervention groups; administrators said volunteers and former teachers sometimes provide remediation help. Counselors are finalizing master schedules to place students and staff are coordinating small-group summer support for students needing extra instruction. Staff characterized most at-risk students as having a reasonable chance of passing with targeted intervention, but said a small number will require intensive support and careful planning to avoid inappropriate retention.
What’s next: Staff will continue remediation, coordinate retest scheduling in the mid-May window and provide summer supports. The board had no action item tied to this report beyond continuing staff support and monitoring.

