Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Child Care Safety topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Senator presents 'Paris Hilton Child Safety and Accountability Act'; Senate carries SB336 over for more stakeholder work

Alabama Senate · April 3, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Senate sponsor Sen. Barfoot introduced SB336 — the Paris Hilton Child Safety and Accountability Act — proposing new DHR rulemaking authority for video surveillance, additional investigative powers for law enforcement and private causes of action for violations at licensed child-care and youth-care facilities. Lawmakers and stakeholders raised questions about implementation, insurance and unintended impacts; the sponsor asked to carry the bill over for further work.

Senator Barfoot presented Senate Bill 336, labeled in the text the ‘Paris Hilton Child Safety and Accountability Act,’ and asked senators to consider new requirements for child-care and youth-care facilities across Alabama. The measure would clarify existing licensing exceptions, allow the Department of Human Resources to adopt rules governing video surveillance and record retention, provide additional authority to law-enforcement investigators handling alleged abuse at facilities, and add private causes of action for certain violations at child-care and youth-care facilities.

Barfoot said the bill responds to serious harms reported in licensed facilities and cited national advocacy and the bill’s public supporters. “This chapter and this bill is known as the Paris Hilton Child Safety and Accountability Act,” he said on the floor, describing the bill’s intent to increase transparency and legal remedies for harmed children.

Several senators pressed the sponsor on practical details: how surveillance would be implemented, what record-retention periods would be required, how the bill would affect for-profit versus nonprofit operators, and whether smaller, well-run providers would be unduly burdened. Senator Sessions said he represents well-run child-care providers in his district and asked whether the bill would create new licensing categories or additional regulatory paperwork for existing centers. Other senators asked about training, whether the bill would require minimum liability coverage, and how civil remedies would work in practice.

Barfoot and supporters said they were seeking a balance between stronger accountability and avoiding undue burdens on providers. He acknowledged stakeholder concerns and said colleagues were working in real time to answer questions raised by industry groups and advocacy organizations. Given remaining questions, Barfoot asked that Senate Bill 336 be carried over so sponsor and stakeholders could refine the measure.

The Senate granted the sponsor’s request and carried SB336 over for further work; no final vote on the bill occurred during this floor session. Sponsors emphasized they would continue conversations with providers, DHR, law enforcement and child-safety advocates before returning the bill to the floor.