Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Parking Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission weighs parking remedies for Marin Joe’s 97‑sq‑ft amendment while allowing small design adjustment
Summary
The Planning Commission gave preliminary feedback March 10 on a proposed 97‑square‑foot front expansion at Marin Joe’s that would not add seats but triggers a parking analysis. Staff and the applicant discussed a shortfall of roughly 33 parking spaces under current code; the commission asked for a formal parking plan, emergency/valet protocols, and evidence on mitigation efficacy before any variance decision.
The Corte Madera Planning Commission on March 10 held a lengthy preliminary review of a design review amendment, rear‑setback variance and parking variance requested by Marin Joe’s. The proposal would add about 97 square feet to the front of the restaurant to meet building and egress requirements without increasing the restaurant’s seat count, according to staff and the applicant.
Staff said the 97‑square‑foot bump‑out is small but triggers a re‑calculation of required parking under town code. The combined on‑site lots total approximately 46 spaces today; under the town’s interpretation of the parking standard the restaurant would require 77 spaces now and 79 spaces with the 97‑sq‑ft increase — a shortfall of roughly 33 spaces. Staff explained the town is already working on a commercial code modernization to add flexibility on parking findings, but those changes will not be in effect until late summer. In the meantime staff urged a package of demand‑management strategies (valet stacking, employee parking management, bike parking, transit or ride‑share incentives, temporary loading/delivery spaces, online ordering and customer ride‑share discounts) to reduce demand and provide evidence to support variance findings.
The applicant’s architect said the 3‑ft addition restores required aisle and egress width that would otherwise eliminate about 10 prime seats; the owner, Chris Henry, told commissioners that losing those seats would make the business financially unviable and asked for a timely resolution. The restaurant team provided a parking demand analysis and a valet plan that adds about 16 spaces through stacking in joint lots; they also proposed long‑term employee bicycle parking and off‑shift employee parking management.
Traffic consultant Steve Abrams of Abrams Associates said trip generation for the restaurant is governed by seat count and the 97‑sq‑ft change would cause a negligible change in trip generation; his evening parking surveys found on‑street parking capacity within roughly 0.15 miles and he reported 40 available on‑street spaces in the worst survey case. He also reported low accident counts for the immediate streets in state data.
Commissioners sought clarity on several points: whether mitigation measures can be made mandatory and how they would be enforced; whether the town will require an employee survey to determine which incentives would actually change behavior; and emergency procedures for valet‑stacked cars. Commissioners generally supported the proposed internal design change to meet egress and ADA standards, but asked staff and the applicant to return with a formal, enforceable parking plan, emergency valet protocols, and clearer data on the effectiveness and enforceability of mitigation measures before any variance is granted. Staff said a parking plan will be required before building permits proceed.
