Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Traffic Studies topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Georgetown officials press for stronger local traffic triggers, worry state rules limit remedies
Summary
Planning staff and council debated how local policy can supplement state traffic-study requirements, with planners explaining state thresholds, and council members urging 'shadow planning,' right‑of‑way reservations and local triggers to require additional mitigation.
Georgetown officials spent substantial time March 30 debating whether the city can require more local scrutiny of traffic impacts than state minimums allow.
Senior planner Elise Katz described what typical traffic studies measure — current conditions, projected additional traffic and a 10‑year buildout with and without improvements — and explained that state design standards and the Kentucky Transportation Cabinet (KYTC) often determine when intersection improvements such as turn lanes or traffic signals are installed. “I’m not a traffic engineer…I just have reviewed a lot of our large site projects,” Katz said, outlining how studies project peak‑hour trips and how benchmarks can trigger improvements.
Council members and commissioners pressed for tools to go beyond the state’s baseline. Suggestions included revising local ordinance language to change what triggers a traffic study, requiring addenda or updated reports as phased developments proceed, reserving right‑of‑way easements up front, and using “shadow planning” — planning for full‑buildout impacts even when a developer builds in phases — so the city can require design elements or easements earlier in the process.
Holden Fleming, the city’s planning director, said staff can require conditions of approval and ask for monitoring addenda from developers; he also noted some state‑controlled improvements may remain outside local control once a development is permitted. Commissioners and council members pointed to specific problem corridors (for example, stretches near Cardome and Bywater Farms) where speakers said historical accidents and narrow road geometry raise safety concerns that go beyond peak‑hour trip counts.
Officials agreed the city should identify which elements it can legally require locally and which are the state’s responsibility. Staff committed to return to the bodies with more detailed answers to specific policy questions and to include the topic in the planning commission’s April 9 agenda for further review.
The bodies did not adopt new rules at the meeting; instead, they asked staff to clarify legal constraints and to recommend specific ordinance language, trigger thresholds and monitoring approaches for future consideration.
