Monroeville Planning Commission approves two three‑lot subdivisions

The Monroeville Planning Commission on March 18, 2026, approved two separate three‑lot subdivisions after brief presentations by the applicants’ surveyor and the owner of the surveying firm.

Paula Montgomery, chairwoman of the Planning Commission, opened the meeting, called roll and moved the commission through routine reorganization before introducing two subdivision applications submitted under the Monroeville Subdivision and Land Development Ordinance No. 2525.

Randy Miller, representing Urban Terrain (the listed surveyor for the first application), described the proposal for 261 SUB — Carmen Bowman Revocable Trust to split tax parcel 976P195 on Batty Road into three lots — Lot 1: 3.3928 acres; Lot 2: 7.04 acres; Lot 3: 2.54 acres. “It’s very simple — it’s just a three‑lot subdivision,” Miller said, adding that third‑party engineering comments had been addressed. A motion to grant preliminary and final subdivision approval was made, seconded and approved by voice vote; individual vote counts were not recorded in the transcript.

Amy Hopkins, owner of Urban Terrain Land Survey, presented 262 SUB — 4C Land Company, a three‑lot subdivision of tax parcel 975S128 at 841 Old Franktown Road. Hopkins described Lot 1 as remaining in commercial use by a linen business, Lot 2 containing a building currently leased by a church that “wants to buy their building and then the parking around it,” and Lot 3 including soccer fields and a residential‑zoned parcel higher on the slope (Lot sizes listed in the application: Lot 1: 7.226 acres; Lot 2: 8.270 acres; Lot 3: 9.959 acres). She noted portions near the soccer fields are in the floodplain and that access easements would allow access through Lot 1. Commissioners had no substantive objections; the motion for preliminary and final approval was seconded and passed by voice vote (tally not specified).

Following the approvals the commission moved to adjourn. No public comments or contested objections were recorded during the two subdivision items.

Both approvals were procedural land‑use actions granting subdivision plats; the actions do not themselves authorize building permits or changes in use beyond the approvals noted and any required permits or site work. The transcript records only voice votes and does not include individual commissioner vote tallies.