Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Nominee questioned about role at company later tied to alleged fake audits; she says CEO acted alone
Summary
A judicial nominee who served as in-house counsel at a company later dogged by a federal investigation told lawmakers she was not involved in allegedly fabricated investor audit materials and that the CEO acted independently; lawmakers pressed for documentary evidence and timeline clarity.
A nominee for the Superior Court who previously served as in-house counsel and later as a fractional general counsel faced intensive questioning on April 2 over her tenure at a private technology company that later entered a Chapter 7 wind-down after a federal probe and criminal charges against its founder.
Committee members asked the nominee to explain when she first learned of the company’s alleged misrepresentations to investors and what internal documents she personally reviewed. The nominee said she…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
