Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Streets Ordinance Enforcement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Gold Creek HOA urges Dawsonville to enforce road-standard ordinance after subdivision work narrows street
Summary
A Gold Creek HOA leader told the Dawsonville City Council the city must require full restoration after subdivision work narrowed Gold Creek Drive, citing Chapter 109 requirements for width, pavement structure, drainage, curb and gutter and questioning an earlier staff approval; the council directed staff to pursue options and legal agreements with the property owner.
Beth Duncan, president of the Gold Creek Homeowners Association, told the Dawsonville City Council that road alterations made during nearby subdivision work have narrowed Gold Creek Drive and raised safety concerns, and she urged the city to enforce Chapter 109’s requirement that altered roads be brought up to current city standards.
"Chapter 109 requires roads altered by development to meet today's standards, including width, pavement structure, drainage, curb, and gutter," Duncan said, adding that paint markings would not bring the road into compliance. She said the HOAs raised concerns before any construction began and repeated them as work progressed, and that administrative approvals by a former planning director should not override the ordinance.
Why it matters: Residents describe safety risks for older neighbors and for emergency access if the narrower road remains. At prior discussions the council had a back-of-the-envelope estimate of about $275,000 to widen roughly 1,300 feet of roadway; the council also discussed lower-cost interim measures such as striping, which staff estimated would cost between $2,000 and $4,000 depending on scope.
Council asked staff to pursue additional pricing for alternatives — including moving one side of the roadway or addressing drainage/catch-basin work that may require right-of-entry to private property. Property owner Michael Turner approached the dais and said he had not refused access outright but expects a structured access agreement negotiated between attorneys; he told the council that a draft agreement exists but remains unsigned.
City attorney advice and next steps: City attorney counsel and council members advised that any entry or survey across private property should follow a negotiated, signed agreement; one council member said the city should get a signed access agreement and obtain pricing on reconstruction and intermediate options. Council directed Public Works to gather additional cost estimates and to coordinate with the city attorney and the property owner on terms.
What wasn’t decided: The transcript records the council’s direction to obtain more information and to attempt to finalize an agreement with the property owner; it does not record a final decision to require reconstruction or a vote to obligate city funds for the full reconstruction estimate.
Who said it (selected quotes): "None of these requirements can be met with paint," Beth Duncan told the council. Property owner Michael Turner said, "We will allow it with a structured agreement with certain conditions," and that his attorney and the city attorney had negotiated a draft agreement that remained unsigned.
Next steps: Staff will pursue the access agreement with the owner, obtain pricing on multiple repair options and report back to the council for further direction.
