Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Appeals Court examines separation‑agreement language in Tester v. McDill contempt dispute

Judicial - Appeals Court Oral Arguments · April 2, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

A contested reading of a separation agreement's phrase 'in addition to' underpinned an Appeals Court contempt hearing. The appellant argued the judge erred by refusing financial exhibits and that 'in addition to' means 'besides' not 'in excess of'; appellee counsel said the father continued to pay base support and the agreement was not ambiguous.

The final argument of the session centered on a family‑court contempt action and interpretation of a separation agreement provision governing supplemental child support.

Self‑represented appellant Kerianne McDill told the panel the court misread the phrase "in addition to" and denied relevant financial exhibits and an…

Already have an account? Log in

Subscribe to keep reading

Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.

  • Unlimited articles
  • AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
  • Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
  • Follow topics and more locations
  • 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
30-day money-back on paid plans