Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Consent Agenda topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Public asks board to pull $1.2M legal amendment from consent; trustees approve consent with limited pulls
Summary
A public commenter asked the board to remove a legal-services amendment from consent and explain large cumulative contract amounts; trustees discussed and ultimately approved the consent agenda (including a pulled fencing bid) and later approved the pulled item, while the commenter asked for transparency on the legal amendment.
Get email alerts on the Consent Agenda topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
During public comment at the May 7 Orange Unified School District board meeting, Crystal Miles asked the board to pull Item 11R (described by the commenter as a legal-services amendment) from consent and provide transparency about cumulative contract amendments that she said total approximately $1.2 million.
"This is a second amendment for another $400,000... that's $800,000 plus the initial $400,000, so we're at $1,200,000," Miles said, requesting the board explain whether the funds were for legal costs, a bond or other work and whether the item should remain on consent rather than being discussed in public.
Trustees handled consent items sequentially. Trustee Vane pulled 11E (a Villa Park High School tennis-court fencing bid) for a brief explanation from staff; district staff said the work is a small technical fix to reinforcement footings and should take a couple of weeks and not affect the pilot opening. The board moved to approve the consent agenda with the exception of 11E; the motion passed. Trustee Thomas later moved approval of 11E and Trustee Erickson seconded; the item passed and the consent agenda was completed with votes recorded as Aye and carried 7-0.
The board did not publicly resolve the specific procurement or cumulative-dollar questions about the legal-services amendment during the meeting; the public commenter asked for the item to be pulled and additional explanation. Trustees indicated they would accept public requests for items to be pulled and discuss them as needed at future meetings.

