Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Stem Credit topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Curriculum committee reviews DHS STEM credit tweak; officials say change will be retroactive and not affect GPA
Summary
The Darien Board of Education curriculum committee on March 20 reviewed a proposal to add 0.125 credit to certain Darien High School science courses to reflect extra seat time. District leaders said the change would be applied retroactively and would not increase GPA weight for science.
On March 20 the Darien Board of Education’s curriculum committee discussed a proposal to modify Darien High School (DHS) STEM crediting so that some full‑year science courses earn an additional 0.125 credit to reflect extra seat time. Presenters said the adjustment is intended to preserve student schedule flexibility while aligning with Connecticut’s nine‑credit STEM graduation requirement.
The presenter told the committee the change responds to how DHS schedules courses under an eight‑day rotation and to ‘‘ensure that our children are meeting those credit requirements and also still having that flexibility’’ to pursue electives and career pathways. Committee members were told the adjustment is student‑centered and meant to maintain the rigor and learning experience of lab science courses.
Christian, the department chair for science, explained the mechanics: some courses include additional seat time beyond a standard semester; adding 0.125 credit brings the full‑year course into balance so that after four years a student would earn five of the nine required STEM credits.
On the question of grade‑point average, the committee heard that the department and the policy subcommittee recommended against increasing the GPA weight for science. As one committee member summarized, ‘‘increasing the weight of the GPA would be not only disproportionate but also not be aligned with our purpose of this policy,’’ and the committee said the credit change would be applied retroactively without changing student GPA weightings.
No formal vote was recorded on the proposal during the meeting. Committee members present voiced support, saying the change would benefit students across performance levels by widening elective choices and preserving access to arts and other courses that students may wish to take.
The committee moved on to a separate agenda item; public comment was noted as absent and a motion to adjourn was announced before the transcript ends.
