Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Governance Goals topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board narrows draft goals and guardrails in study session, emphasizing ELL and special-education focus
Summary
At a study session Oct. 24, the Washington Elementary School District board discussed draft five-year goals and guardrails, debated cohort versus grade-level metrics and emphasized guardrails to protect long-term ELL and special education students; staff will recalculate a flagged K–3 metric and prepare SMART measures for board vetting.
Dr Ramos opened a study session after the public hearing to lead the board through drafted five-year student outcome goals and associated guardrails. He asked members to identify which drafted goals to refine and what values the board wanted to protect while the superintendent and staff pursue measurable outcomes.
Board members proposed specific targets during the discussion. One board member said the percent of seventh-grade students demonstrating proficiency on the math assessment should rise from 19% in Spring 2024 to 34% by Spring 2029. Members also discussed aspirational targets for ELA and English-language learners, whether to follow cohorts over time or measure grade-by-grade growth, and the importance of tying goals to specific assessments.
Several members urged the board to narrow attention to vulnerable student groups. Miss Nikki Gomez Wayy and others pressed for guardrails that require any proposed strategy to include explicit plans for English-language learners and students receiving special education services. Staff member Lori flagged a discrepancy in the K–3 metric (it averaged intermediate and proficient levels) and said the district will recalculate the figure before finalizing measures.
Board members worked at tables to draft board self-guardrails and community-facing guardrails. Proposed board self-guardrails included not directing day-to-day operations, avoiding over-emphasis on inputs at the expense of student outcomes, conducting periodic policy and operating-policy reviews, and performing an annual board self-evaluation. Table reports on values emphasized stakeholder voice, cultural responsiveness, equitable resource allocation, teacher retention and whole-child supports.
Dr Ramos described the governance role: the board sets goals and guardrails; the superintendent returns with SMART-formatted interim measures and strategies (one to three measurables under each guardrail) for the board to vet and either approve for implementation or send back for revision. Board members discussed taking multiple draft options to the community for feedback but cautioned that materials and outreach must be accessible and translated to reach diverse families.
The board ended the session by directing staff to recalculate the K–3 metric and to prepare measure packages for future vetting and community engagement.
