Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Historic Preservation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council asks staff to evaluate historic-preservation reforms after HPC letter and public pleas to save small homes
Summary
The council directed staff to study a set of historic-preservation priorities from the Historic Preservation Committee, including clarifying demolition rules, updating the town inventory and survey, considering a rolling 70-year threshold (instead of pre-1941), and exploring ways to preserve smaller homes; council requested a feasibility and level-of-effort assessment.
After hearing a detailed letter from the Historic Preservation Committee and public comment, the Los Gatos Town Council on Dec. 2 unanimously asked staff to evaluate a prioritized set of preservation reforms and return with feasibility and level-of-effort information.
Lee Kintana, chair of the Historic Preservation Committee, told council members the committee had forwarded a 20-item letter and urged clearer code language on demolition procedures, adding explicit findings to the town code for identifying significant historic resources (including pre-1941 houses), and updating the town inventory and photographic survey. "That section is so confusing that we believe it needs to be totally rewritten," Kintana said about the demolition language.
Resident and committee member Susan Bernett described the practical effect the committee seeks to address: an ongoing loss of smaller, older homes and the need to ensure replacements are compatible with neighborhood character. Bernett urged tighter demolition rules and suggested changes to floor-area or setback rules to keep modest homes viable.
Mayor Hudis summarized five priority objectives for staff study: preserve smaller homes, review district boundaries (including potential extensions), refresh the Bloomfield survey and update photographic records, require replacement structures in designated districts to be historically relevant, and consider changing the town's cutoff for historic consideration from pre-1941 to a rolling 70-year standard (which would move the cutoff to roughly 1955).
Council members emphasized the need to balance preservation goals with the town's housing-element obligations and cautioned that many reforms require public engagement and staff resources. The council asked staff to assess level of effort, feasibility, and likely budget or consultant needs and to return with a work plan once the objective-standards project is further along.
What happens next: Staff will review the five priority items and related code changes, estimate staff time and consultant needs, and report back to council with a proposed timeline and resource request.
