Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Planning Legal topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council adopts findings in response to Housing Accountability Act challenge for Capri Drive housing application

Los Gatos Town Council · December 16, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The council unanimously adopted findings under Government Code §65589.5 responding to a 'challenged conduct' notice from the applicant for 14288 Capri Drive. Staff and outside counsel said the town's consistency comments and requests for arborist/architect peer reviews and a conditional-use permit are reasonable, objective steps during application review.

The Town Council unanimously adopted a resolution on Dec. 16 responding to a 'challenged conduct' notice filed under California’s Housing Accountability Act for a proposed multifamily housing application at 14288 Capri Drive.

Staff and outside counsel explained that the Housing Accountability Act includes a procedural mechanism by which applicants can notify a public agency that the applicant believes the agency’s conduct during application review amounts to disapproval. The town received such a notice and used the statute’s timetable to consider evidence and to prepare findings. Counsel recommended findings stating that (1) the town’s comments and additional information requests are consistent with objective standards, (2) the conditional-use-permit requirement and peer-review fees are legitimate, and (3) the town has continued to process the application during the review.

The resolution the council adopted explains the town’s legal position and tells the applicant what is needed for the town to proceed toward a final determination or a hearing date — including required technical submittals and compliance with objective standards. Council members asked staff to request any written guidance the applicant said it had previously sent the town; staff agreed to follow up.

What this means: The council’s action is a formal, code‑required response to a Housing Accountability Act challenge. It preserves the town’s continuing discretionary review while laying out the objective items the applicant must provide.

Authorities: Government Code §65589.5 (Housing Accountability Act) guided the procedure and the town’s obligation to respond within the statutory timeline.