Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Transportation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Public voices split as Menlo Park hears comment on costly Middle Avenue undercrossing
Summary
Residents offered competing views on a proposed Middle Avenue Caltrain undercrossing: opponents flagged a $60M+ price tag and safety/maintenance concerns, while supporters said grade separation would improve safety and walkability and that multiple funding sources exist. The council will review the project in a future study session.
Menlo Park received a mix of skeptical and supportive public comment on a proposed Middle Avenue pedestrian and bicycle undercrossing intended to separate people from Caltrain tracks.
Michael Barkley told the council the estimated cost—"at least $60 million"—was disproportionate to a quarter‑mile convenience and urged the city to halt the project, warning of potential ongoing maintenance and safety costs. "This tunnel will wind up being a homeless shelter," Barkley said, asking whether the city had recent user surveys and cost analyses.
Residents including Will Osler, Adina Levin (Seamless Bay Area) and John Woodell countered that grade separation advances safety and walkability, helps reduce driving for short trips, and supports access to schools and local amenities. "I strongly support this project...I would use it to get to Safeway," said Will Osler. Adina Levin noted long outreach and said the project could draw from multiple funding streams including developer fees and regional transportation funds.
Council members acknowledged competing views and the project’s high price tag; Mayor Nash said the undercrossing will return as a study session so the council can review design and funding options. Staff and speakers said the item is still in informational/study phase and that future reports will address cost, funding sources and projected usage.
