Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Open Government topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Staff outlines SB77/Brown Act changes; council hears implications for remote participation and accessibility
Summary
Staff briefed the council on SB77 and related Brown Act changes that revise remote‑participation rules, require new disclosures and set accessibility and translation requirements for larger jurisdictions beginning July 1, 2026; staff will return with a draft meeting‑disruption policy and recommendations for advisory bodies.
Get email alerts on the Open Government topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Veronica presented an overview of recent Brown Act changes consolidated in SB77 and related bills and explained what the new rules mean for Portola Valley.
Key changes staff described include updated teleconferencing rules that retain “traditional” teleconferencing procedures but add a consolidated “just‑cause” remote‑participation option with new disclosure requirements; members participating remotely must now disclose whether other adults are present at their remote location and specify the statutory basis for their remote appearance. The town must also list remote participants and their statutory basis in meeting minutes.
SB77 creates an optional teleconference pathway for eligible subsidiary/advisory bodies (subject to council authorization and periodic renewal) but requires at least one staff member to be present at the designated physical location for those meetings. For larger jurisdictions (county populations of 600,000 or more), beginning July 1, 2026, additional accessibility requirements will apply, including translation of agendas into applicable languages, a meeting‑disruption policy and outreach to underrepresented communities. Veronica said Portola Valley does not meet the 20% threshold for mandatory agenda translations but will still post a public location for community‑provided translations and will publicize how to request interpretation.
Veronica also summarized AB2647 (distribution of writings) and SB827 (a new requirement for two hours of fiscal and financial training every two years for designated officials and staff) and noted staff will return with draft policies and recommended procedures to comply with the new requirements.
Council members asked how the optional advisory‑body teleconferencing would work in practice, whether present staff could be volunteers and how the town would handle special meetings and technical disruptions. Staff said the council must authorize optional teleconferencing for eligible advisory bodies, renewal is required every six months, at least one person must staff the physical location, and the town will prepare a service‑disruption policy with required good‑faith restoration efforts.
Next steps: staff will prepare a draft meeting‑disruption policy, post the Brown Act guidance and examples for council review and propose findings and an authorization process if the council wants to permit optional teleconferencing for particular advisory bodies.

