Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Residential Design topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Planning commission approves redesigned addition at 1812 Castanada Drive

City of Burlingame Planning Commission · September 8, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Burlingame Planning Commission approved a major design-review permit for a first- and second-story addition at 1812 Castanada Drive after staff and a design-review consultant recommended approval and commissioners asked that irrigation/planting items be finalized at building permit.

The Burlingame Planning Commission on Sept. 8 approved a major design-review application for an addition at 1812 Castanada Drive, finding the revised plans addressed prior design-review comments and met residential design guidelines.

Staff told the commission the project proposes a first-floor addition at the front of the house and a new second story with a stated total floor area of about 3,140 square feet; staff noted the site is in the city’s hillside overlay district, which protects distant views, and recommended approval with 13 conditions. A design-review consultant attached to the staff report also supported approval.

Applicant Marad Diner said the team had “listened to the comments” from the commission and worked with a designer to make revisions. Designer Yuri described the project as stepping back the second floor, using horizontal wood siding and aluminum-clad windows, and keeping balcony and plate heights proportional to neighboring homes to reduce visual impact.

Commissioners asked whether a planting and irrigation plan was included; staff said irrigation is often verified during the building-permit review if it was not included in the entitlement submittal and that plan-check requirements have changed over the years. After discussion, Commissioner Loenthal moved to approve the project per staff findings; Commissioner Fuff seconded. The roll-call vote recorded four yes votes, and the motion passed 4–0.

The commission’s approval is appealable to the city council within 10 days; staff noted appeals must be filed in writing with a $924 fee that covers noticing costs.