Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Fire Hazard Mapping topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Residents and council discuss Cal Fire hazard map adoption and municipal-code implications
Summary
At public comment and during consent-item discussion, residents and staff debated whether adopting the state's Cal Fire hazard map should change the city's municipal-code application of high fire-hazard standards citywide; council approved the related consent item after clarifying distinctions between mapping and building standards.
La Habra Heights residents raised questions about how adopting the state Cal Fire hazard map would interact with the city—ode that currently applies high fire-hazard building standards citywide.
In public comment, resident Stephen Black said municipal Code 4420B appears to apply high fire-hazard standards across the entire city and asked whether that code "supersedes the Cal Fire map as being stricter" if the city adopts the state map. He recommended deleting the city section if council adopts the map and wishes to limit standards to mapped areas.
During the consent-calendar discussion, staff clarified the difference between building-standard code amendments the city already applies (for high fire-hazard zones) and the separate obligation to adopt the state fire-hazard map from the state fire marshal—or certain administrative purposes. "There is a difference between one area or the others related to building standards," staff said, noting the state map adoption is a separate action from local municipal-code building standards.
Council members debated whether the municipal code should be edited concurrently with any map adoption so residents and property owners have consistent expectations about which parcels are subject to home-hardening or tempered-glass requirements. After discussion, council approved the consent item that included the state-map adoption steps while acknowledging outstanding questions about aligning local code language with the map.
The exchange highlights a technical tension: municipalities can adopt building standards that are stricter than state minimums, but doing both a citywide municipal standard and a mapped overlay can create overlap or apparent conflict that staff and council agreed should be addressed in follow-up work.
