Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Ethics Investigations topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
City reports independent reviews found no sustained violations in probes of Councilmember Suarez
Summary
City legal staff told the council two independent investigations — a county public integrity review of residency allegations and a separate independent law‑firm probe into harassment claims — concluded the weight of evidence did not support violations and no further action will be taken.
City legal staff reported to the Lawndale City Council that two independent investigations into allegations concerning Councilmember Bernardet Suarez have concluded with no sustained findings.
According to the city attorney’s disclosure, the residency allegation was referred in late October 2024 to the Los Angeles County District Attorney’s Public Integrity Division; that office informed the city in June 2025 that it found no actionable violations and closed the matter. Separately, and at council direction, the city engaged an independent law firm to investigate a harassment complaint from a former staffer; the investigator, the attorney told the council, concluded that the weight of evidence did not support a legal finding of harassment.
The city attorney said confidentiality, employee‑privacy rules, attorney‑client privilege and Brown Act rules about closed‑session materials limited what could be shared publicly, but emphasized the city had retained impartial investigators and that both matters are considered closed. The attorney added that while the harassment investigation took longer than expected, that expansion of time reflected scheduling and evidence‑sharing issues rather than substantially more hours or higher costs to the city.
What it means: The council received the report and filed it; no further public action or formal discipline was announced. The attorney discouraged public questioning in open session citing privileges and privacy protections.
The meeting record shows the city sought independent, fresh reviewers for both matters — the DA’s Public Integrity Division for the residency matter and a law firm unaffiliated with prior city work for the harassment investigation — and that both reviewers recommended no further action based on the evidence they reviewed.
