Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Water Billing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Compton water manager walks council through how to read a bill, meter units and relief options
Summary
City water general manager David Bennett gave a line‑by‑line explanation of Compton water bills — including that one billing unit equals 100 cubic feet (748 gallons), a two‑tier rate structure, readiness‑to‑serve charges, CIP fees (citing Ordinance 2182) and low‑usage discounts — and answered council questions about meter readers, statement‑date variance and billing software fixes.
David Bennett, general manager of Compton’s water department, presented a detailed primer on March 3 to help residents and council members understand the components of a Compton water bill and steps to address unexpectedly high charges.
Bennett said billing units are measured in 100 cubic feet, equivalent to 748 gallons, and walked the council through the bill’s sections — owner and service addresses, account and reference numbers, usage history, water and meter-reading summaries, sewer charges, capital‑improvement (CIP) line items and late‑fee rules. “100 cubic feet of water is 748 gallons,” he said as he explained the unit conversion.
He described Compton’s two‑tier system (a lower per‑unit rate up to 19 units and a higher rate beyond), a readiness‑to‑serve fee to cover fixed costs and a water‑improvement (CIP) charge implemented under Ordinance 2182. Bennett also explained options for residents who think a bill is wrong: request a leak detection test, meter verification or a review; low‑usage customers may apply for discounts that range from about 20% to 40%.
Council members pressed Bennett on operational details. He said the city has four meter readers (three who read consistently plus one who handles work orders), that statement dates can vary by two to four days because reader scheduling is not yet fully automated, and that the department fixed a late‑fee display error caused by a billing‑software (Springbrook) update tied to SB 998. On bond charges that appear on bills, Bennett said he would check ordinance records to confirm the payoff date and provide a follow-up to council on exact collections and balances.
Why it matters: Bennett’s presentation sought to reduce confusion that has driven calls to the city about high bills and to provide steps residents can take before assuming an error. Council members asked for materials to be included with mailed notices and for staff to provide more detailed financial figures (e.g., how much CIP/bond revenue remains and exact payoff dates).
Next steps: Bennett offered to circulate soft copies of the bill guidance and business cards; council asked that the department post the common‑causes checklist in mailed material and that staff follow up with requested financial clarifications.
