Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use And Code topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission defers changes to water/sewer impact fees and RV‑storage rules after public concerns
Summary
During the March 25 meeting commissioners opened public hearings on water/sewer impact‑fee updates and a recreational‑vehicle storage ordinance but deferred both items for further legal and policy review after residents raised cost, equity and state‑law preemption concerns.
The City Commission opened public hearings on March 25 for two separate land‑use code items — proposed updates to water and sewer impact fees and an ordinance regulating recreational vehicle (RV) storage — but deferred both items for further staff and legal review after residents signaled concerns.
Planning staff and the manager explained that proposed amendments to Chapter 22 would update water and sewer impact fees (planning cited the consultant Stantec) because current fees, staff said, are insufficient to meet the city’s infrastructure needs. Planning Director Gregory Gay told the commission that the fee increases would apply to new development and additions; he and Public Works Director A.R. Austin also said connectivity for existing properties in historically underserviced industrial pockets is available but requires permitting and, often, expensive site work.
During the public hearing Mark Cooper urged the commission to consider carving out areas where connection costs make redevelopment prohibitively expensive and warned that the combined cost of plans and necessary grinder pumps can be significant for small owners.
Separately, the commission took up an ordinance amending definitions and permitting rules for travel trailers, camping trailers and motor homes, creating a registration process and a $100 registration fee, restricting use for habitation, and lowering first‑offense civil penalties (the draft reduced a $500 first‑offense fine to $250). Several residents raised legal objections, saying the state prohibits certain local restrictions or fees on vehicle parking and objected to annual or recurring charges; one resident said, "I don't want to pay for having an RV parking in my house." (resident comment).
Given the legal concerns and the public comment, Commissioner Santiago and staff agreed to defer the RV ordinance and for the manager to work with the attorney to confirm state law implications and to return with clarified language. For the impact‑fee ordinance staff and the commission likewise deferred further action so that the commission could consider compliance and fund‑tracking language (Vice Mayor Kelly asked that impact fee collections be deposited promptly into designated trust funds and that a compliance mechanism be included). No ordinances were adopted at the March 25 meeting.
