Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Technology Policy topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board tables Apple iPad master lease after debate over K–2 device use and screen time

East Penn Board of School Directors · March 9, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

After a lengthy discussion about instructional benefits, screen time and equity, the board voted 7–1 to table a proposed multi‑year master lease for elementary iPads pending more evidence on K–2 impacts and implementation details.

The East Penn board on March 9 tabled a proposed master lease for Apple iPads intended to support an elementary one‑to‑one device program after extended questioning about how devices are used in early grades, how much screen time is appropriate and whether a shared‑device model might be preferable.

Administrators and technology staff described the proposal as the next refresh in the district’s long‑range technology plan and said the devices support differentiated, personalized learning in English language arts and math through district‑selected apps (example apps referenced included Lexia and programs that contain resume/activity components for older students). Dr. Campbell explained that district guidelines aim for roughly 40 minutes per week of app‑based activity per content area in primary grades (K–2), up to about 50 minutes in intermediate grades. The administration also said devices are typically sent home mid‑October through mid‑March after initial lessons in digital citizenship and internet safety.

Board concerns focused on three subjects: whether educational benefits at K–2 outweigh increased screen time and device‑home usage, whether the district has rigorous local evidence that one‑to‑one devices improve early‑grade outcomes, and whether a classroom‑set model would reduce costs and risks (damage, uncharged devices). Critics asked for studies and teacher testimony specific to K–2. Board member Dr. Whitney said she remained unconvinced that K–2 onetoone devices are essential and stated her intent to oppose the agreement because she wanted stronger local evidence. "I'm going to vote no on this lease agreement tonight," she said during the discussion.

Outcome: prompted by Dr. Jenowski, the board voted to table the Apple lease agreement pending additional presentation and evidence about K–2 impact; the motion to table passed 7–1 (Miss Ford cast the lone nay). Administration and the technology team said they will return with more targeted data, usage reports by grade and clearer home‑use guidance, and they noted hotspots are available for families who need home internet access.

What to watch: the district will present a consolidated packet with usage metrics, evidence of learning outcomes tied to the district’s selected apps, teacher input from K–2 classrooms and options for device‑home policies before the board reconvenes the lease discussion.