Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Advertising And Youth Exposure topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Public commenters urge DCC to tighten billboard and advertising rules, address dispensary clustering
Summary
Multiple public commenters at the Cannabis Advisory Committee meeting pressed the Department of Cannabis Control to strengthen rules limiting large-format advertising (billboards), require warning labels, and enforce distance rules where dispensaries cluster near youth-serving facilities.
At the start of public comment the committee heard a string of remarks calling for stricter advertising limits and action on dispensary clustering.
Becky Rap urged the committee to "consider strengthening regulations around cannabis advertising, particularly large-format advertising such as billboards," telling members that billboards along major highways are "unavoidable for families and young people" and risk normalizing cannabis use for youth. Alisa Padden, a research scientist with the Public Health Institute, asked the committee to review a recent auditor's report on packaging and advertising and requested that the DCC report how it will act on the auditor's recommendations.
A caller noted the federal Kids Internet and Digital Safety Act recently advanced by the U.S. House Energy and Commerce Committee, saying the proposal recognizes concerns about youth-targeted online advertising and urging the state to "fall in line" with federal efforts to restrict youth exposure. Cesar Velasquez read a submission from a youth advisory council that described new dispensary openings clustered within minutes'walks of each other and close to youth-oriented facilities; the youth correspondent asked the DCC to enforce distance rules between youth centers and dispensaries.
Kelly McCormack and Peggy Walker cited recent research tying adolescent cannabis exposure to increased risks of psychotic and bipolar disorders and asked the committee to prioritize prevention, potency limits and warning labels. Ann Riddle described billboards placed near a community college serving 18-to-22-year-olds and called the placements "egregious," urging the DCC to revisit billboard policy in sensitive contexts.
Commenters asked the committee to use rulemaking, enforcement and targeted restrictions (for example, limiting out-of-home advertising in areas with a high percentage of residents under 21) to reduce youth exposure. Several asked that the DCC provide a public response to auditor recommendations and clarify what steps it will take.
The committee received the public comments; no formal action was taken during this meeting on advertising policy. Members requested DCC follow-up and indicated the topic should remain on future agendas for consideration and possible rulemaking.
