Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Housing Infrastructure topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission orders updated appraisals for Progress Point as developers show interest; housing and sewer funding discussed
Summary
Facing developer interest in Progress Point and possible grant matches, the commission voted to commission new commercial appraisals (estimated $8,000–$9,000 each) and heard a lengthy housing proposal from Commissioner Graves that outlined a $2–2.5 million sewer-extension estimate and proposals for creating tax-increment districts to spur 200 housing units.
The Greene County Redevelopment Commission authorized updated independent appraisals for Progress Point parcels after commissioners heard that previous appraisals are two to three years old and that current and prospective grants may require recent valuations.
Commissioner Shane moved to update appraisals; Commissioner Scott seconded the motion, which carried by voice vote. Staff estimated a new commercial appraisal cost in the neighborhood of $8,000–$9,000 per property and said it could first consult the prior appraiser informally to determine whether full new appraisals are necessary before committing funds.
The appraisal decision came amid detailed discussion led by Commissioner Graves about a county housing strategy. Graves identified three candidate locations for housing development — an 80–90 acre Coleman family parcel east of the golf course and near Walmart, a site on the 231 corridor north of I-69, and an eastern site near Eastern Heights — and argued sewer access is the primary constraint for rapid residential growth.
Graves said bringing sanitary sewer to the Coleman parcel would allow smaller lot sizes and a higher density development, turning what might yield 60–70 one-acre lots into as many as 200 smaller lots. He estimated engineering and construction to extend sewer to that area could cost roughly $2–2.5 million, not including engineering design, easement acquisition or construction management. Graves asked the commission to consider creating commercial and residential tax-increment financing (TIF) districts to capture future incremental tax revenue, and to ask engineering firm Wesler to submit a proposal for design and oversight.
Financial advisor Jim Higgins cautioned that many current revenue streams are tied to earlier TIFs and that the commission must weigh any pledge of increment against the risk of losing long-term unpledged increment. "If you do not pledge those funds for any kind of repayment that TIF district does not have an expiration," Higgins said; he added that pledging increment for debt repayment can create an expiration that affects long-term revenue.
Commissioners agreed to ask staff to initiate updates to the appraisals and to seek a Wesler proposal and additional financial analysis ahead of future decisions. Graves said he would return with the property owner (John Coleman) and additional specifics at the next meeting so commissioners missing this session can participate.
