Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Flex Days topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Union and district argue over whether to fix flex days by date or define them by quarter
Summary
Negotiators debated a union proposal to make two and a half flex days permanent and to distinguish two professional-development flex days (the Monday and Tuesday before Thanksgiving) from grading flex days; district staff asked for clearer documentation requirements and warned of possible legislative or calendar changes that could affect implementation.
GNEA representatives asked that the negotiated agreement spell out two and a half flex days each year and treat two November days as professional-development (PD) flex days that require documented completion of PD hours to qualify.
The union said the proposal would make planning easier for teachers: one flex day at the end of the first quarter (Friday), a half-day at the end of the second quarter, and a flex day at the end of the third quarter, plus two PD flex days on the Monday and Tuesday before Thanksgiving contingent on completing nonwork PD hours.
District negotiators said specifying concrete calendar dates makes administration easier but warned that putting PD days “in black and white” could create problems if state lawmakers change rules about what counts as PD. District staff also expressed concern about how PD hours are logged: a negotiating participant suggested clarifying that teachers work an eight-hour contract day but would log six hours of PD on PD flex days to account for lunch and non-PD time.
Both sides flagged potential confusion for staff and building administrators about the distinct approval processes for different flex days. Negotiators agreed to take the proposal back for language refinement, to clarify documentation and logging requirements, and to check how calendar-committee timing and legislative developments could affect permanent language.
