Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Data Centers topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Commission reviews draft resolution defining data centers, members cite grid capacity and farmland concerns

Bradley County Regional Planning Commission · March 27, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Planning staff brought a draft resolution that adds a definition for data centers and adds data centers/AI server farms to uses permitted in I1 with a use permit; commissioners supported excluding cryptocurrency mining and asked members to review the text before the county commission.

Bradley County planning staff presented a draft resolution that adds a definition for data centers and makes data centers and related AI/server‑farm uses subject to the county's I1 use permit process.

Bentley told commissioners the item had been recommended to the county commission in January with changes and that this version primarily adds a definition for data centers to the permitted uses in I1. "I pretty much did was add a definition for data centers and um added it to the resolution and to the uses permitted in I1," Bentley said.

During discussion a commissioner noted the committee intentionally did not include cryptocurrency mining in the definition and emphasized the need to review recent developments in neighboring jurisdictions where rapid investment in data centers and related infrastructure has strained local electrical grids and led to controversy over farmland and utility impacts. The commissioner urged members to look at recent news and to provide feedback before the county commission votes.

Commissioners expressed general support for the revised language and agreed to forward their comments to staff ahead of the county commission meeting. Bentley said he would finalize the draft for the county commission, and members were invited to flag anything they wanted changed before the second Monday in April (the county commission schedule referenced in the discussion).

No formal county‑level action was taken at this meeting; the planning commission reviewed the draft and prepared to transmit a recommendation to the county commission.