Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Wildlife Crossings topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board splits on wildlife-crossing funding; approves $200,000 matching grant on first reading
Summary
After extended debate and public testimony, the board approved on first reading a resolution to provide a $200,000 matching contribution for a Roaring Fork Safe Passages engineering and feasibility study; the item will return April 8 for final adoption with the public hearing continued.
Pitkin County commissioners debated and then voted March 25 to approve, on first reading, a $200,000 matching contribution to Roaring Fork Safe Passages for an engineering feasibility and alternatives analysis to study wildlife crossing options on Highway 82 and adjacent open space.
Background and staff recommendation: Connie Baker outlined the Q1 supplemental request package and said the packet included a proposed $120,000 contribution toward Safe Passages. Commissioners pulled the Safe Passages item from the supplemental for separate consideration after public comment and board questions about permissible uses of Open Space & Trails funds under the county's ballot language.
Board debate: Commissioners expressed divergent views. Supporters said the feasibility study is a modest, early-stage investment for a project that can save human and wildlife lives and lever additional matching funds. Opponents urged caution, citing potential limitations under open-space ballot language, unclear matching documentation and the possibility that different habitat-improvement strategies could be higher priority.
Public testimony: Will Roush (Roaring Fork Safe Passages board) and several community members urged support, saying properly designed crossings and fencing reduce collisions and improve habitat. Tony Croninberg urged interagency coordination with the City of Aspen if the study points to infrastructure that intersects city property.
Board action: The board voted in favor of a resolution to provide a $200,000 matching grant (the motion carried by voice vote with one recorded no). Commissioners and staff said the action functions as an approval on first reading and that the public hearing will remain open and the item will return April 8 for final adoption and adoption of a written resolution.
Why it matters: The feasibility study could be the precursor to major infrastructure (fencing, underpasses/overpasses) with multiagency coordination and significant cost implications; commissioners flagged legal and policy constraints regarding use of open-space funds for highway crossings.
Next steps: Staff will continue to coordinate with Safe Passages, Colorado Parks and Wildlife and the City of Aspen, and the board will consider final adoption at the April 8 meeting with the public hearing continued.
