Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Alteration Stay topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Palm Springs board orders 120‑day stay, requires historic‑resources report for 877 Panorama garage demolition
Summary
After public comments and expert submissions, the board voted 3–2 to stay an owner request to demolish the detached garage at 877 Panorama and directed the applicant to commission a historic resources report (up to 120 days) using the city's on‑call consultants; the applicant bears the cost.
The Historic Site Preservation Board on March 3 voted 3–2 to stay an owner-initiated request to demolish the detached garage at 877 Panorama (case HDMO2025-0013) and to require a historic resources report to evaluate whether the parcel should be reclassified under the city’s preservation ordinance.
Staff presented the application and reported the parcel is on the city’s inventory as a Class 3 resource for its association with architect John Porter Clark. Staff noted recent unpermitted work — including roof and window replacements — was cited by Code Compliance and that the owners have since submitted permits to address those violations. Staff recommended initiating designation proceedings and processing a historic resources report to resolve whether the site meets the municipal ordinance’s criteria.
During public comment, architectural historian Margarita Jarubeck (Environmental Science Associates) said her review including county assessor records and historical photos showed post‑fire alterations and replacement windows, and concluded the property “doesn’t have sufficient integrity to convey significance in association with the architect.” Owner representative Sherry Bonstel (land‑use attorney, Greenberg Lesker) summarized letters (including one from an architecture professor) reaching a similar conclusion for the garage and said the owners had filed the necessary permit applications after the citation.
Board members questioned whether the integrity evaluation could depend on subsequent corrective permits and whether enforcement actions should proceed in parallel; staff said a formal historic resources report would evaluate integrity, permits and any violations together. After deliberation, the board approved a motion to stay processing of the alteration/demolition request for up to 120 days and to authorize the applicant to commission the historic resources report, using the city’s on‑call consultants; the fee and report commissioning are the applicant’s responsibility. The motion passed 3–2.
The stay requires the report be completed within the 120‑day window and returned to the board for a recommendation; the city will select from its on‑call consultants and the applicant will pay the associated fees under the current fee structure.
