Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Development Finance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Lincoln council adopts tighter rules for special assessments and community facilities financing
Summary
The City Council adopted a restated policy limiting special-tax terms, restricting developer payoffs and certain conduit financing, and requiring staff timelines as part of updated community facilities district (CFD) and special-assessment goals meant to protect homeowners and clarify long-term obligations.
The Lincoln City Council on March 10 adopted an amended policy aimed at tightening how the city permits special-assessment financing and community facilities districts (CFDs) for new development.
The resolution, presented by staff and bond counsel Brian Forbath, limits the financing tools that can shift long-term costs onto homeowners. "The council is not going to allow for the financing of deferred fees, particularly the Sparta fees," Forbath said, summarizing council direction captured in the redline policy before members. Council members praised the package as a homeowner-protecting measure and a modernization of a policy first drafted in 1987.
Why it matters: the changes include a 40-year maximum special-tax term, a prohibition on transition events that would convert facility taxes into perpetual services taxes, new limits on developer payoffs (including restrictions on long-term POGO-style payoffs), and tighter rules for conduit issuers tied to project size. The policy also requires staff to present developer requests to council within a 90-day timeframe and earmarks any savings from CFD refundings to homeowners rather than monetized public improvements.
Council members and staff said the revisions respond to earlier workshop direction and input from the development community. Bond counsel and staff noted that conduit issuers may still be used for smaller developments under a 150-unit threshold but would require council consent above that size.
Public input: Resident Stan Nater asked whether the city intended to manage CFDs in-house and queried report-accountability language in the staff packet. Staff replied that the city has piloted in-house CFD management and found it feasible for some projects; they also said new electronic approval workflows create an audit trail for report reviews.
Vote: Council moved to adopt the resolution and approved it by voice vote; the transcript records the motion, second and a voice vote with no roll-call tallies recorded.
What happens next: staff will implement the updated policy and apply it to future CFDs and special-assessment requests. Council and staff indicated they will continue case-by-case discussions where developer financing proposals remain complex.
