Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Transportation Projects topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Residents tell Calabasas council to pause roundabout plans, cite evacuation and maintenance worries

Calabasas City Council · February 25, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

At public comment, residents urged the council to slow or rethink a proposed roundabout at Calabasas Road and Yucca Road, warning it could hamper emergency evacuations and calling for a robust public‑education program; one caller called the $6.5 million plan a "budget‑busting boondoggle."

Several Calabasas residents used the city’s Feb. 25 public‑comment period to press councilmembers to delay or redesign the planned roundabout at Calabasas Road and Yucca Road, arguing the project could create evacuation hazards and long‑term maintenance burdens.

Joe Choco, a long‑time resident, said the city has not provided sufficient outreach or driver education ahead of construction and asked the council to adopt a "big‑picture approach" that evaluates emergency‑evacuation behavior. He cited the 2018 Woolsey Fire and the Kenneth Fire, saying those incidents produced gridlock that left some residents trapped when access to the 101 was blocked.

"During a major fire event ... residents were trapped," Choco told councilmembers, and he urged the city to "create and implement a robust outreach and education program." He also requested a cross‑departmental process for vetting projects that affect public safety and transportation.

Michael Harrison said extending the sidewalk and other changes would serve "approximately zero pedestrians a year" and characterized the project as a fiscal misstep, calling it a "$6.5 million budget‑busting boondoggle." He urged the council to reconsider the proposal and look instead at lower‑cost traffic improvements funded through Measure M.

Staff replied that the item will return for further council consideration and that additional public comment will be accepted at that time. Council did not take action on the project that evening.