Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Artificial Intelligence topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Senate narrows private right of action in H.816 on AI use in mental health services and passes the bill

SENATE · May 9, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Lawmakers adopted an amendment to H.816 to narrow a private right of action related to AI-provided mental health services and then passed the bill in concurrence with the House. Senators debated whether the amendment sufficiently targeted licensed professionals and covered corporate entities.

The Senate amended and passed H.816, an act regulating the use of artificial intelligence in the provision of mental health services. On third reading a senator from Wyndham offered an amendment to clarify language and narrow a private right of action so that liability aligns with traditional duty-of-care principles and is focused on licensed professionals and entities responsible for care.

During floor questioning senators sought clarification about the term “entity,” asking whether it would include corporations, AI systems, or non‑licensed individuals. The sponsor and other senators said the amendment intentionally narrowed the private right of action to avoid penalizing parents or other non‑professionals who consult AI for information, while preserving civil remedies when a defendant with a duty of care breaches that duty and causes injury.

After a brief recess for counsel consultation and colleague conferral, supporters said the amended language was appropriately targeted and the presiding officer put the amendment to the chamber. The amendment was adopted by voice vote, and a subsequent third reading and concurrence vote passed H.816.

Senator Madison raised process cautions about regulating AI and noted that AI usage is evolving; other senators emphasized the need to balance consumer protection with avoiding overly broad private litigation exposure. The bill now proceeds as passed in concurrence with the House.