Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Land Use Annexation topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council hears staff briefing on two annexation petitions, asks staff to prepare modified resolutions

Enumclaw City Council · April 27, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Community development staff presented two annexation petitions covering about 18 acres (staff suggested a modified combined package of roughly 38 acres valued at about $8.5 million). Council asked the attorney whether conditions (including applicant-paid consultant) are possible and indicated support to prepare separate resolutions for each annexation.

Community Development Director Chris Massenet gave a detailed presentation on two annexation petitions the city received in March and described staff’s recommendation to modify the proposed boundaries.

Massenet said the two submittals together involve five vacant residentially zoned parcels totaling roughly 18 acres. Staff recommended expanding the proposed areas to include adjacent parcels so the resulting annexation would be more regular and better comply with the comprehensive plan; with those additions staff estimated a combined area of about 38 acres with an assessed value near $8.5 million. Massenet recommended processing the areas as a single annexation for efficiency but acknowledged the Community & Economic Development committee’s preference for handling them separately.

Council members asked practical questions about the 60% petition method required for annexation and possible conditions. Massenet explained the petition route requires signatures representing 60% of total valuation in the proposed area and that the Boundary Review Board could require modifications if the city submitted irregular boundaries. Council raised administrative capacity concerns and discussed whether applicants could be required to pay for a consultant to handle the technical work; one council member asked staff to consult the city attorney on whether that could be a condition of acceptance.

Council signaled informal support by head nods for staff to prepare resolutions that would modify the proposed annexation areas and indicated a preference to prepare two separate resolutions (one per area) for council consideration within the 60-day statutory window. Staff said it would return with legal guidance and draft resolutions.

What’s next: Staff will consult with the city attorney about potential conditions (including consultant cost recovery) and prepare draft resolutions to accept, reject, or modify each annexation as requested by council.