Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Cannabis Zoning topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Pine County adopts zoning amendment tightening cannabis venting and odor rules after public hearing

Pine County Board of Commissioners · May 1, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

After a public hearing with multiple residents raising concerns about odor and venting, the Pine County Board on April 21 adopted Ordinance 2026-17 amending county cannabis zoning (Ordinance 2024-58). The measure passed 3-1 with Commissioner JJ Waldhalm opposed.

The Pine County Board of Commissioners on April 21 adopted an amendment to the county’s adult-use cannabis zoning ordinance to address implementation issues that have arisen since state licensing began in 2025.

The amendment, adopted as Pine County Ordinance 2026-17, was moved by Commissioner Matt Ludwig and seconded by Commissioner Roger Nelson. The motion passed 3-1 (Commissioner JJ Waldhalm opposed; Commissioner Steve Hallan was absent). The board held a public hearing before the vote and received several comments from nearby residents and cannabis business representatives about odor mitigation, vent placement and filter requirements.

County Administrator Kelly Schroeder told the board the zoning changes respond to practical issues the county has seen while implementing Ordinance 2024-58, which the board adopted in December 2024 before state licenses were issued. Public commenters urged stronger venting standards and clearer mitigation requirements. Royalton Township resident John DeGray raised concerns about odor mitigation and vent location; Denise Weis urged rules addressing mezzobusiness and microbusiness cultivation and the use of bonds; Patrice DeGray spoke about complaint forms and mitigation for lights and odor. Joe Zappa/Erba described operating his business as a farm that uses mixed lighting; Brian Coonradt compared cannabis odor to other agricultural odors, and Trent Kannenberg expressed support for the county’s handling of cannabis issues.

During board discussion Commissioner Roger Nelson said the amendment did not resolve all outstanding questions and asked the Zoning Board to clarify the definition of a “rebuilt greenhouse,” the definition of “objectionable odor,” and whether the county should adopt a green energy requirement. Commissioner JJ Waldhalm asked whether cannabis complaint records were provided to the Zoning Board and whether the county could test odors, suggesting the purchase of testing equipment. Administrator Schroeder responded that cannabis complaints are handled like other zoning complaints and therefore are not routinely provided to the Zoning Board.

The board closed the public hearing at 10:38 a.m. and proceeded to the vote. The ordinance language adopted modifies implementation requirements for ventilation and odor mitigation; the ordinance number is 2026-17, described as an amendment to Ordinance 2024-58 regulating adult-use cannabis zoning within Pine County.

The ordinance was adopted by roll call vote. The record shows the board debated definitions and enforcement mechanics but directed the Zoning Board to continue work on outstanding definitional and technical questions. The transcript does not specify an effective date for the ordinance.