Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Immigration Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Residents urge Butler County commissioners to end sheriff's ICE contract during public comment
Summary
Multiple residents used public comment March 17 to call on the board to end the county's contract with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), citing student distress, moral concerns and alleged contractor problems; speakers urged the commissioners and sheriff to reconsider participation in federal immigration detentions.
During the meeting's public-comment period March 17, multiple residents urged the Butler County Board of Commissioners to end the sheriff's contract with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).
Robert Mullenix (S13), a therapist at Miami University's Hamilton campus, said the presence of ICE operations in the county has caused students ‘‘distress’’ and asked the board to reconsider the contract. Ellen Price (S9) summarized Ohio House Bill 200 and warned of local implications if the law's enforcement or funding penalties affect local law enforcement practices. Several other residents—Kathy McMahon Closterman (S14), Susie Lute (S15), Linda Snow Griffin (S11), Anne Janssen (S16) and Linda Spurrier (S8)—also urged the board to end or reconsider participation with ICE, citing moral concerns, economic arguments and reputational risk for the county.
Speakers raised a mix of concerns: student fear and community distress (Mullenix); potential statutory and enforcement consequences of state legislation (Price); the county profiting from detentions and lacking sufficient accountability (Closterman and Janssen); and contractor-related claims such as unpaid invoices and worker complaints raised by one speaker (Lute). One speaker, Lute, described alleged contractor practices and worker training concerns and said such failings were troubling because personnel in immigration operations are armed.
No commissioner action to end or modify the ICE contract was recorded in the meeting; the chair closed public comment after the scheduled speakers concluded. Public commentators referenced Sheriff Jones by name when urging a change in priorities and accountability.
Why it matters: resident concerns about the ICE contract link county policy, sheriff operations, community trust and the county's public image. Commissioners did not respond with a policy decision at the meeting; the comments were part of the public-comment record and may inform future deliberations.
What happens next: the comments were entered into the record. The board did not announce immediate follow-up at this meeting.
