Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Iga Governance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board debates IGA language, seeks clearer protections for public-health autonomy
Summary
Board members raised concerns that section 3 of the intergovernmental agreement (IGA) could allow county administrator directives to override public-health decisions; the board asked counsel to draft clarifying language and discussed forming a small committee to work on revisions.
Board members spent substantial time reviewing the intergovernmental agreement (IGA) with county administration and raised concerns that broad language requiring the board to follow county ordinances and administrator directives could impede the board's statutory autonomy.
Committee member: "That language is broad enough that if Todd Hollenbeck says you shall or shall not do something, that language implies that the executive director has to follow that directive." The speaker urged revising the paragraph so the board retains authority to override directives it determines are not in the best interest of public health.
A contract attorney present outlined his background representing counties and boards of health and offered to draft proposed amendments. Attorney: "I have been a practicing attorney since 1993... I took on that Mesa County Board of Health back in 2003," and he said he could prepare proposed language for section 3 and paragraph 7 ahead of the next public meeting.
Members noted operational dependencies on county services — accounting, payroll, and building use — and that those in-kind contributions (estimated in discussion at roughly $1 million to $2 million annually) complicate the relationship; speakers said the IGA should preserve operational cooperation while clearly protecting the board's independent judgment on public-health matters.
The board discussed creating a small committee (one to three members) to work with counsel on draft language and bring recommended amendments back to the full board. No formal amendment was adopted at this meeting; members agreed to a future public discussion and to circulate proposed wording in advance.
