Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Senior Services topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Fox River Grove trustees agree to $5,000 allocation for seniors group amid ARPA discussion

Village President and Board of Trustees · May 1, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Village Board reached a consensus to allocate $5,000 from the general fund for the Fox River Grove seniors group for one year to cover transportation and special events; trustees discussed using ARPA funds and staff paperwork implications.

Trustee Melissa Schladt proposed allocating $5,000 in the FY2022/23 budget to the Fox River Grove seniors group to restore a funding stream that was discontinued in 2017, saying the money would pay for accessible transportation and special outings.

Schladt, who said she would volunteer to organize the events, told the board that charter-bus quotes for a six‑hour round trip in the Chicagoland area ranged from about $2,000 to $2,500 and that $5,000 would cover one major outing and smaller events. "I would like to see the money be spent with Village businesses whenever possible," Schladt said.

Trustee Patrick Wall and Trustees Jennifer Curtiss and Steve Knar supported using American Rescue Plan Act funds for seniors this year; Administrator Soderholm confirmed ARPA funds are eligible for this request but cautioned that using ARPA for multiple small expenditures would increase staff paperwork. Trustee Andrew Migdal said he was concerned about setting a precedent for other nonprofits and noted the seniors group is not limited to Fox River Grove residents.

After discussion the board's general consensus was to allocate $5,000 from the general fund for one year to the Fox River Grove seniors group, with further discussion about ongoing funding in the future. The consensus was recorded as direction to staff rather than a formal ordinance vote.

The decision leaves details — including whether the village will administer payments directly to vendors as Schladt proposed — to staff follow-up and to future budget deliberations.