Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Groundwater Equity topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Southern Douglas County residents flagged as at-risk in debate over satellite wellfields and groundwater use
Summary
Commissioner Trisha Bernhardt warned that draft language about satellite wellfields and moving groundwater to population centers could leave southern rural residents without water; the commission asked consultants to add explicit impact analysis and protections before public release.
During review of the interim draft, Commissioner Trisha Bernhardt raised sharp concerns that language suggesting satellite wellfields in less-populated parts of Douglas County be used to convey water to population centers would not serve — and could harm — residents in the county’s southern areas who rely on private wells and lack water districts.
Bernhardt told the commission: “If you take it all from us and move it to the north, we're all in trouble,” and asked where the sentence in chapter text came from and whether the plan would discuss the impacts to southern residents. She emphasized that many southern property owners have no municipal connection and would be left with groundwater as their only option.
Commissioners and consultants debated whether it is appropriate to include such language in the draft or whether the plan should reserve such proposals for implementation chapters with clear protections. Roger Hudson and others said the draft should not prematurely endorse large-scale transfers without measurable protections, and James Eklund and Evan Hila suggested qualifiers tied to which aquifers and to implementation limits (for example, restricting use of certain aquifers or adding protections for Dawson and Denver aquifer users).
Consultants noted the plan’s heat maps and appendix data will show where net pay is greater and where recharge and extraction issues vary, but members requested explicit language about impacts and measurable protections for southern Douglas County residents be added to the draft before public release. The commission directed staff and consultants to incorporate impact analysis and protections into Chapter 10 (implementation) and to clarify the distinction between physically available groundwater and economically extractable groundwater.
The exchange did not produce an immediate policy change but led commissioners to assign follow-up edits and to ask that mitigation measures be documented for public review.
