Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Personnel Board Opt Out topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee advances bill to let Trussville opt out of Jefferson County personnel board after litigation
Summary
A House committee advanced HB153, which sponsor Chairman Garrett said would allow the city of Trussville to opt out of the Jefferson County personnel board. The measure was refiled and advertised after court challenges; members said repassing the advertised bill should reduce further litigation costs.
A legislative committee voted to advance HB153, a bill that would permit the city of Trussville to opt out of the Jefferson County personnel board, after the sponsor detailed a multi-year legal dispute over the measure.
"We can cut out all of those attorneys' fees and litigation if we repass the bill that advertised it," Chairman Garrett said in presenting the bill, summarizing court activity that began after the earlier passage of a similar measure.
Garrett told members the county personnel board sued after the previous enactment; lower and appellate courts ruled in Trussville's favor but the Alabama Supreme Court returned the case to lower court judges to resolve a procedural question about whether the original legislation should have been advertised. To address that technicality, Garrett said the bill was re-advertised in the relevant counties and refiled.
Committee members asked how broadly the bill would apply. One member noted the state's municipal "class" system is grounded in historical population classifications and asked whether other municipalities might be unintentionally affected. Garrett and other members said the measure was drafted to address Trussville specifically because it spans two counties and now meets the population threshold that had not existed when the classifications were set.
A committee member said the bill had been advertised in both counties affected by Trussville, and members discussed whether other towns with similar circumstances exist; the sponsor and others said they had researched the list and found Trussville to be a unique case under the bill's criteria.
After discussion, a member moved to advance the bill and the committee approved it by voice vote. The transcript records the committee giving the bill "in favor." No roll-call vote tally was recorded in the transcript.
The committee did not specify a next hearing date on the transcript. The committee adjourned following subsequent business and brief introductions.
