Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Labor Wage Recovery topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Assembly approves lien remedy for unpaid wages despite business warnings
Summary
The Assembly passed a bill to create a preferential lien for unpaid wages — retroactive up to six years and with personal liability for top shareholders — prompting objections from lawmakers who said it could deter lending and harm small businesses.
The Assembly passed legislation to create a lien remedy that would help workers recover unpaid wages by giving employee wage claims priority over other liens, including mortgages and UCC liens.
The bill’s sponsor said the measure is intended to preserve assets so workers who prevail in court can actually collect owed pay. The sponsor described the proposal as a tool to prevent employers from dissipating assets after judgments are entered.
Opponents, including members who identified themselves as representing small-business concerns, said the bill is unchanged from a version vetoed by the governor and warned it could undercut the ability of small and medium businesses to obtain financing. One critic said the change could subject minority shareholders to potentially unlimited liability and deprive equipment suppliers and banks of reliable first-lien positions that underwrite loans.
The debate included procedural and practical alternatives raised by members who opposed the bill: they advocated for court-supervised remedies such as restraining orders, escrow, bonds or expedited show-cause procedures to secure disputed funds pending adjudication rather than creating an automatic priority lien on filing.
A supporter who explained a yea vote cited New York’s history of worker-protection laws and referenced a 2015 report documenting unpaid judgments owed to hundreds of workers, arguing the change will strengthen workers’ ability to get paid and deter unscrupulous employers.
After floor debate and several members explaining their votes, the clerk recorded the result and the bill was passed. (Vote tally as announced on the floor: 94 yes, 45 no.)
What happens next: The measure was reported passed on the Assembly floor; the transcript records comments noting the governor had vetoed a prior version and that the current text remains unchanged in material respects. Any further steps (conference committee, enrollment, or the governor’s action) were not recorded in this excerpt.
