Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Civil Service Exam Protests topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Alliance Civil Service Commission affirms Clancy determinations and sets May 12 public hearing

Alliance Civil Service Commission · March 24, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Alliance Civil Service Commission voted unanimously to accept the determinations submitted by 'Clancy' on three protested exam questions—denying protests on questions 95 and 116 and removing question 112—and set a public hearing for May 12, 2026 to post notice and address the matter further.

Chairperson Renee Young presided over a special meeting of the Alliance Civil Service Commission on March 24, 2026, at 12:35 p.m. at the City Administration Building. The commission reviewed a packet containing determinations attributed to 'Clancy' on protests of specific exam questions and voted to adopt those findings.

Member Matt Mohr moved “to approve Clancy's determinations for questions 95, 112, and 116,” with Chairperson Renee Young seconding. The motion recorded that Clancy recommended denying the protest for question 95, accepting and removing question 112, and denying the protest for question 116. The motion passed unanimously with members Renee Young, John Gross and Matt Mohr agreeing.

Secretary Candice Martin requested a public hearing date so she could post the required legal notice; commission members agreed on May 12, 2026. The meeting record notes no executive session was held. Member John Gross moved to adjourn at 1:00 p.m.; Member Matt Mohr seconded the motion and all agreed. The commission scheduled its next regular meeting for April 14, 2026, at 12:30 p.m. at the same location.

The transcript refers throughout to 'Clancy' as the source of the determinations but does not specify in the meeting record whether that name refers to an individual, a firm, or another entity. The record also does not include verbatim statements from exam candidates or details about the substance of each protest beyond the determinations listed.