Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Rules Eligibility topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission asks for legal review after questions about promotion eligibility
Summary
Commissioners raised questions about a one-year-in-grade eligibility rule for promotion exams and directed Commissioner Matt Mohr to review the Ohio Revised Code; they also discussed updating commission rules and requested staff follow-ups to verify candidate records.
During the March 18 meeting, commissioners questioned how the commission's rule that a candidate must be "in grade for one year" before taking a promotion exam would apply to a patrolman testing for lieutenant. Commissioner Matt Mohr was asked to review the Ohio Revised Code (ORC) for relevant provisions and report back.
The exchange arose while commissioners and staff reviewed Clancy exam scheduling and candidate eligibility. The commission asked Secretary Candice Martin to invite Chief X to the next meeting or arrange for the chief to call in so departmental leadership can clarify whether scheduling or local practice affects eligibility. Commissioners also agreed Martin should pull the requested NTN day and review records back two years to help clean up the candidate list.
In old business, commissioners discussed updating the commission’s rules; Matt Mohr said he would examine the ORC for statutory guidance. Martin was tasked to forward civil service conference information to members when it is received.
The meeting record shows the commission is seeking both statutory confirmation and input from department leadership before finalizing eligibility interpretations or rule changes; no formal rule change was adopted at this session.
