Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Transportation Signage topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee votes ITL on mileage-based exit-numbering bill, citing plan and funding concerns
Summary
Lawmakers debated HB 17-85 to require mileage-based exit numbers; DOT described planning and cost implications and the committee voted ITL, saying renumbering should be addressed through the 10-year highway plan or with clearer funding.
Get email alerts on the Transportation Signage topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Public Works and Highways committee recommended ITL (inexpedient to legislate) on House Bill 17-85, which would require mileage-based exit numbers on tier-1 highways.
Representative Timothy Horrigan urged the change as alignment with the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices and neighboring states, and he framed it as a user-friendly improvement for out-of-state motorists. ‘‘Mileage-based exit numbers are what out-of-state motorists expect to see,’’ Horrigan said.
Lee Baronis, administrator of the Bureau of Traffic at NHDOT, said the department has no official position but outlined practical and fiscal implications: preliminary planning exists in the draft 10-year highway plan, the change could displace other planned projects if funded immediately, and some interchanges (I-393) were omitted in the current draft. He recommended placing renumbering in the 10-year planning and GAS IT prioritization processes if pursued.
Members expressed that renumbering has merits but questioned whether the legislature should mandate it now given a roughly $1.6–2.3 million estimated fiscal impact and a multi-year implementation plan already sitting in the 10-year highway plan. The committee voted to recommend ITL; the roll call recorded 13 in favor, 1 opposed, and 3 not voting. The bill was placed on the consent calendar as ITL.
What happens next: The committee signaled it prefers that the renumbering be considered through DOT’s 10-year plan and GAS IT prioritization rather than separate legislation now; the bill was recommended ITL by committee vote.

