Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Hb93 Residency topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Sponsor says bill would align hunting-and-fishing residency with PFD test; committee sets hearing aside
Summary
Representative Rebecca Himshut told the Senate Resources Committee House Bill 93 would align resident hunting and fishing standards with the Permanent Fund Dividend residency test (including a 12‑month domicile requirement and a 180‑day allowable absence rule), with an effective date of January 2028; the committee set the bill aside for a future hearing after invited testimony on implementation and enforcement.
Representative Rebecca Himshut presented House Bill 93 to the Senate Resources Committee as a measure intended to make the state’s resident hunter and angler rules more enforceable by aligning those standards with the Permanent Fund Dividend (PFD) residency test. “We want to set a more enforceable standard for whether or not you are eligible to hunt and fish as a resident,” Himshut said, adding the bill allows up to 180 days out of state for allowable absences and includes a delayed effective date of January 2028 so people can adjust.
Himshut said the bill maintains permanent hunting and fishing identification (PID) cards, but use of those cards would require meeting the residency standard. “The PID is permanent,” she said, “but even now you have to meet the residency standard to use your PID for hunting and fishing.”
Joe Felkel, deputy director for administrative services at the Alaska Department of Fish and Game, told the committee the department had not provided formal written invited testimony but could answer questions on implementation and fiscal impacts. He said the department can request documentation, work with Wildlife Troopers on investigations, and reach out to applicants if there are questions about continued residency.
Major Aaron Frenzel of the Alaska Wildlife Troopers described how enforcement typically works: investigations can begin from phone complaints or from field contacts where troopers may ask about domicile, school, work or other criteria used to assess residency. “Sometimes we get complaints … and we might start investigation from our desk,” Frenzel said; in the field officers may ask to see licenses and any relevant ID.
Committee members pressed on fairness and edge cases: Senators asked what happens to longtime property owners who spend significant time out of state, whether senior or permanent licenses could be jeopardized, and how caregiving or work-related absences would be treated. Sponsor and staff said allowable absences can be added to the standard and that caregiving is treated as an allowable absence in many cases, but individual circumstances may require follow-up.
The committee did not open public testimony for HB 93 at this hearing and set the bill aside to be heard again in the near future.
