Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Literacy Program topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board hears progress on K–3 literacy review; final recommendation to be presented in May
Summary
Curriculum leaders briefed the board on a two‑year K–3 literacy review, reporting an instructional framework aligned to the science of reading, use of AIMSweb data, focus groups with teachers, and a final recommendation scheduled for committee review May 7 and full board presentation May 13.
Get email alerts on the Literacy Program topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Curriculum leaders on April 1 told the Darien Board of Education that a two‑year review of K–3 literacy has produced an instructional framework aligned with the science of reading and a plan for family-facing rubrics and handbooks.
Ms. Roller and the literacy subcommittee said the review grew from contract negotiations with the DEA in 2023 and included teacher surveys, classroom observations, focus groups at each elementary school and analysis of student data. The team used the universal screener AIMSweb, curriculum assessments and writing samples to compare the pilot program to the district’s current literacy approach; the presenters said short-term implementation did not produce measurable differences yet and emphasized the need for longer-term data.
Board members asked detailed questions about the data and the focus-group process. One member noted that survey results can vary in quality and emphasized that the focus groups—which included teachers involved in the pilot and grade‑level colleagues—helped provide richer qualitative information. The presenters said administrative representation includes two elementary principals and that a smaller decision-making subgroup would meet again to finalize recommendations.
The literacy subgroup will present its recommendation to the curriculum committee on May 7 and to the full board on May 13. The board requested additional clarity on the analytic methods and how qualitative teacher feedback was weighed against screener results.
Next steps: committee and full-board consideration in May, development of rubrics and a handbook for families and teachers.

