Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Infrastructure topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Ditch owners and county disagree over who pays for culvert fix; commissioners defer replacement to 2027
Summary
After detailed testimony and photographs, county staff said replacing a corroded culvert at the West Arm Ditch near KOA would cost the county about $27,000; the county offered to install the culvert this year if ditch owners purchased the pipe (~$7,400), but owners rejected the compromise to avoid precedence. Commissioners said the 2026 budget contains no funds and the replacement will be scheduled for 2027 unless it becomes an emergency.
A disputed irrigation culvert on County Road 23 near the KOA received extended public comment and technical explanation during the Ouray County commissioners' April 14 meeting.
Road & Bridge staff (Ty, speaker 5) displayed photographs showing hydraulic head at the West Arm Ditch head gate, ongoing sedimentation and a corroded corrugated-metal culvert that was installed in 2017 after an emergency repair. Ty described the county's budget constraints for 2026 and said culvert replacement in the manner the ditch company requested is a capital project the county did not budget this year. "When I replace this pipe, I'm gonna install high density polyethylene double wall construction... and it will probably outlast all of us," Ty said, but added the county has only one capital improvement project budgeted this year (Corbett Creek).
Ty offered a practical compromise: if the ditch owners purchased the pipe (approximately $7,400), the county would supply labor and installation this year; otherwise full replacement would need to wait until the scheduled 2027 capital work. Ditch representatives, including Richard Weber (speaker 13) and others, described substantial sediment removal work already undertaken and said they were unwilling to contribute funds because doing so would set a precedent for asking private ditch owners to pay for a county infrastructure repair.
"What we're not willing to do is to set a precedent that every other rancher might be asked to do this in the future," said a ditch representative. Residents and water users described how sedimentation reduces flow and affects irrigation; one said cleaning the channel regularly restored 60–70% more water for irrigators but that the problem recurs.
Commissioners and staff acknowledged the water users' hardship but said the county must follow its adopted budget. A commissioner summarized available options: the county could accept the ditch owners' purchase of pipe to expedite work this year, or defer the replacement under the current plan. The ditch owners declined the purchase option.
The board directed that, absent an emergency that threatens the road, the county will schedule the culvert replacement under the 2027 budget cycle, and county crews will perform emergency dig-outs if the culvert plugs and public safety or access is threatened. No formal emergency action was taken during the meeting.
The debate highlighted tensions between private irrigation maintenance and public roadway infrastructure funding; staff recommended an engineering review if the board wants to explore long-term alternatives such as routing the ditch in a pipe under the road.
