Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Infrastructure Pipeline topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Harrison County approves variance for Mark West pipeline crossing, commissioners discuss deeper cover standard
Summary
The Harrison County Commissioners Court approved a variance allowing an uncased pipeline crossing for Mark West on Darko and Terrapin Neck roads and debated updating the county's minimum cover requirement for future crossings from 36 inches to about 5–6 feet; the court asked staff to return with a utility application and policy update.
Harrison County commissioners approved a variance for a proposed Mark West pipeline crossing and signaled they want to tighten county standards for future pipeline installations.
The court voted 4–0 to approve the variance for the crossing at Darko and Terrapin Neck County roads while commissioners said they would work to update the county's utility specifications so future crossings require deeper cover. "I'd like to see us change it to about 6 foot on any future lines," said a commissioner (Committee member, S4), urging a change from the county's current local minimum of 36 inches.
The commissioners and staff discussed safety risks for buried high‑pressure lines and whether standard specifications should separate low‑pressure utility crossings from high‑pressure oilfield sales lines. S1, the presiding officer, said the variance will be approved now and the utility application will be brought back for final approval at the next court meeting after staff updates the policy and the applicant submits the full application.
Why it matters: the discussion reflects a push to strengthen local standards after the county received a request to allow an uncased crossing. Commissioners framed the change as a preventive safety measure to reduce the likelihood of future strikes on more hazardous lines.
What happens next: staff will process the utility application and return to the court with the application and proposed amendments to the local utility policy for formal adoption. The court approved the variance by roll call and recorded the motion as passed 4–0 with one commissioner absent for the meeting.
