Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Enrollment Projections topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
District demography report shows falling utilization; board to consider building‑use recommendations
Summary
Superintendent Dr. Fields presented demographer projections indicating district building utilization at about 60.9% now and projected to fall to roughly 55.2% by 2030–31 under current residential assumptions; STEAM program enrollment was cited as a key factor in secondary projections.
The Ferguson‑Florissant R‑II board heard a district enrollment and capacity briefing that flagged declining building utilization and the need to consider alternatives for facility use.
Superintendent Dr. Fields reviewed mid‑series projections from demographer Dr. Charles Coffron and said the district's current building utilization rate stands at about 60.88%. Using mid‑series residential enrollment projections and accounting for historical STEAM program enrollment patterns, the district projects a residential‑only utilization of about 55.18% by the 2030–31 school year unless enrollment or program configurations change.
Dr. Fields explained that the demographer's mid‑series is the district's planning standard and noted the presentation used a methodology that isolates residential enrollment and then adjusts secondary totals for students who historically attend STEAM programs. The district also displayed a functional‑capacity analysis from an earlier MGT study that breaks utilization into categories (e.g., inefficient, adequate, approaching inadequacy and inadequate) to frame facility decisions.
Board members asked questions about the methodology, how STEAM enrollment redistributes students among buildings, and whether projections should include non‑residential (transfer) students and programmatic shifts. Dr. Fields said the district will present specific recommendations at the next board meeting for how to respond to projected underutilization and noted that options under study include boundary adjustments, program placement changes and other alternatives.
The presentation framed the projections as planning data, not an immediate action; however, Dr. Fields said the board would review recommendations to address long‑term utilization at the next meeting.
