Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Medicaid topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

D.VA tells Senate Health & Welfare HR1 will drive $1.3M admin cost; committee hears proposed Medicaid copay and ABA coding changes

Senate Health & Welfare · April 3, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Joint Fiscal Office staff told the Senate Health & Welfare committee that implementing federal HR1 redeterminations will require about 12 new positions and roughly $1.3 million gross; the meeting also flagged proposed Medicaid co-pay increases, an ABA coding reduction and confusion over family planning match language.

Joint Fiscal Office analysts told Senate Health & Welfare on April 3 that federal changes under HR1 will require the Department for Vermont Health Access (D.VA) to perform Medicaid eligibility redeterminations every six months instead of annually. The administration's implementation estimate includes 12 new positions (about $1 million gross) and roughly $300,000 in additional operating expenses, a total near $1.3 million to process more frequent reviews.

Analysts also identified several administratively driven or policy-driven changes in the governor's budget: a proposed increase in Medicaid prescription co-pays (raising preferred/non-preferred drug co-pays from $1/$3 to $5/$11) estimated to reduce costs by about $1.1 million gross; a contentious Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA) coding adjustment the administration says removes duplicative codes (the House did not change that proposal); and House language (section E307.8) that asks D.VA to maximize family-planning billing codes while not restoring a previously proposed $85,000 match.

Committee members asked staff to clarify implementation feasibility and the potential service impacts, especially around ABA services for people on the autism spectrum and family-planning billing practices. Joint Fiscal Office staff recommended follow-up conversations with D.VA to resolve implementation confusion and assess risks of shifting costs or losing federal match.

The committee will schedule department-level hearings for D.VA and other AHS components to test assumptions and get more precise cost and operational detail before making final recommendations.